Doomsday journalism, a type of writing distinguished by its focus on sensationalism and catastrophe, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. While it easily attracts attention and garners more clicks than a more grounded article, the effects of this reporting style are significantly more influential than one would assume.

One prominent drawback is the negative impact on the public psyche. Repeated exposure to this fear-driven style of news can lead to panic, anxiety, and a sense of helplessness among readers and viewers. This reporting not only hurts readers but also the integrity and credibility of news and journalism institutions. By focusing on sensationalist narratives, readers are shown that these news outlets are not dependable, and readership declines. 

Additionally, the focus on these extreme scenarios diverts attention from more important issues that would otherwise garner proper attention and support. By sensationalizing events, media outlets contribute to the already distorted public perception of global issues, preventing the public from playing their much-needed role in global society.

The harmful effects of doomsday journalism are more than just sensational, they are psychological, erode trust in media outlets, and hinder exposure to more pressing issues. Sensationalist news outlets need to rethink their approach to journalism and prioritize responsible and balanced reporting for the sake of society.